Skip to content
photools.com
photools.com
  • Customer Portal
  • Products
    • IMatch
    • IMatch Anywhere™
    • Release Notes for All Products
  • Shop
  • Downloads
  • Support
    • Contact & Support
    • IMatch Online Help
    • User Community
    • Release Notes
    • IMatch Learning Center
    • IMatch Anywhere Learning Center
    • IMatch Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
    • IMatch Anywhere™ Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
    • DAM Knowledge Base
    • IMatch Developer Center
  • Blog
  • Privacy
    • Privacy
    • Impressum / Datenschutzerklärung
  • Press
photools.com
photools.com
  • Customer Portal
  • Products
    • IMatch
    • IMatch Anywhere™
    • Release Notes for All Products
  • Shop
  • Downloads
  • Support
    • Contact & Support
    • IMatch Online Help
    • User Community
    • Release Notes
    • IMatch Learning Center
    • IMatch Anywhere Learning Center
    • IMatch Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
    • IMatch Anywhere™ Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
    • DAM Knowledge Base
    • IMatch Developer Center
  • Blog
  • Privacy
    • Privacy
    • Impressum / Datenschutzerklärung
  • Press
This image visualizes the metadata mess photographers and other creatives encounter when using the wrong tools.

The Hidden Problems of Image Metadata: Why Your Photos May Not Be as Organized as You Think

By Mario M. Westphal / August 18, 2024

In today’s digital world, where photos are taken, shared, and edited across various platforms, image metadata is crucial. This metadata—EXIF, IPTC, GPS, and XMP—contains important information about your images, such as camera settings, location, keywords, description, copyright and legal information, and more. However, as you switch between different software applications or platforms, you may encounter issues with metadata inconsistencies, corruption, or loss. This can lead to significant problems, especially for photographers and creative professionals who rely on accurate metadata for organization, copyright protection, and client deliveries.

The Problem with Image Metadata Across Platforms

Despite established standards for image metadata set by industry bodies like the International Press Telecommunications Council (IPTC) and the official XMP standard, many popular software applications fail to fully adhere to these guidelines. As a result, they produce sub-standard, incomplete, or even incompatible metadata.

1. EXIF Data Loss and Corruption

EXIF (Exchangeable Image File Format) metadata is perhaps the most well-known. It includes details such as the camera model, exposure settings, and the date and time the photo was taken. Unfortunately, many photo editing applications do not handle EXIF data correctly. For example, some software may strip out important EXIF information or corrupt maker notes when you save or export an image, leading to data loss. This is particularly problematic when sharing images with clients or uploading them to websites that rely on this data for accurate display.

2. Incomplete IPTC Metadata

IPTC metadata is used to store information about the content of an image, including keywords, captions, and copyright information. Inconsistent support for IPTC standards across different software can result in incomplete or missing metadata. This is especially concerning for professionals who need to ensure that copyright information is preserved across all platforms and that their images are searchable through keyword metadata.

The IPTC publishes compatibility lists for software. Naturally, photools.com IMatch gets excellent compatibility and completeness notes.

3. GPS Data Issues

GPS metadata, which stores location data where the photo was taken, is increasingly important for both personal and professional use. However, this data is often mishandled by various software applications, leading to incorrect or missing location information. This can be a significant issue for photographers who need accurate location data for editorial, travel, or documentary photography.

4. XMP Compatibility Problems

XMP (Extensible Metadata Platform) is a more flexible and comprehensive metadata standard developed by Adobe. It is used to store a wide range of metadata in a format that can be easily extended and adapted. However, not all software supports XMP fully or correctly, leading to compatibility issues when images are transferred between applications.

A common problem arises when EXIF and legacy IPTC metadata are duplicated within XMP. For instance, critical timestamps like “date created” and “date subject created” are stored both in EXIF and XMP metadata. While many applications allow users to modify these timestamps, they often update only the XMP metadata, leaving the outdated information in the EXIF record.

This results in conflicting metadata, with two different sources of truth for these timestamps—EXIF and XMP. Which one should be trusted? IMatch addresses this issue by ensuring that EXIF, GPS, IPTC, and XMP metadata are always synchronized, providing consistent and reliable metadata.

5. ‘Hidden’ Metadata

Some applications utilize proprietary XMP containers (namespaces) to store metadata entered by users, rather than using the official XMP metadata keyword and description fields. For instance, when you add a description or keywords to an image, this data is not stored in the standard XMP metadata fields, but instead is saved in an application-specific XMP container.

Although the data remains accessible for XMP-aware applications and is still stored within the file, the keywords and descriptions entered may not be visible in other applications. This occurs because these applications typically expect to find keywords and descriptions in the official XMP metadata tags specifically designed for this function, rather than in some obscure XMP container used by only one application. By using proprietary containers, users may inadvertently limit the interoperability of their metadata with other applications.

How to Avoid Metadata Issues

To avoid these problems, it’s crucial to choose software that adheres to industry standards and properly manages metadata. One standout option is IMatch, our digital asset management (DAM) software, which is known for its excellent metadata management capabilities.

Why IMatch Stands Out

  • Integration with ExifTool: IMatch leverages the powerful ExifTool, the industry standard for reading, writing, and editing metadata. ExifTool is widely recognized for its reliability and accuracy in handling all types of metadata, ensuring that your images maintain their integrity across platforms.
  • Comprehensive Metadata Support: IMatch provides full support for EXIF, IPTC, GPS, and XMP metadata, ensuring that all relevant data is preserved and correctly interpreted when images are moved between different applications or shared with clients.
  • Support for Vendor-specific Maker Notes: Many camera vendors bury important shooting data inside proprietary maker notes inside the EXIF record, With the help of ExifTool, IMatch makes this data visible and usable.
  • User-Controlled Metadata Handling: Unlike other software that may automatically strip or alter metadata, IMatch gives users complete control over their metadata. This ensures that no critical information is lost during the editing or export process.

How IMatch Helps Fixing Metadata Mess

At photools.com, we frequently encounter metadata issues. When users transition to IMatch from other software, they often discover for the first time that the metadata in their files is incomplete, out-of-sync, or even unreadable—a situation we refer to as the “metadata mess.”

IMatch is designed with a deep commitment to metadata integrity. If you take the time to enter timestamps, keywords, descriptions, and other details, this information should be securely stored within the metadata of your images (or in XMP sidecar files for formats that don’t support embedded XMP). This ensures that your data remains consistent and reliable, no matter which software you use, and can be trusted for decades to come.

Metadata Tools in IMatch

IMatch offers unique tools like the Metadata Analyst, the Metadata Mechanic and TimeWiz that help you with diagnosing and fixing metadata problems caused by other software or devices.

If you want to learn more about image metadata and the typical problems and solutions, see our comprehensive Metadata for Beginners topic in the IMatch Help System.

Conclusion

The importance of maintaining accurate and complete metadata cannot be overstated, especially for photographers and creative professionals. The problems with metadata inconsistencies, loss, and corruption often go unnoticed until it’s too late—typically when switching software or sharing images with others.

By using software like IMatch, which is designed to manage and preserve metadata to the highest standards, you can avoid these pitfalls and ensure that the metadata created by your camera, phone and yourself remains accessible and compatible.

A cute little red robot working on a computer, looking into the camera.

Mario M. Westphal is the developer of IMatch, the digital asset management system (DAM) for Windows. He has a strong background in software development and photography, gained through working for over 30 years in the field for many clients. His special interests are photography, music. literature and of course software development, with a strong focus on digital asset management, database systems and image metadata. He hails from Germany.

← Previous Post
Next Post →

photools.com is a leading developer of Digital Asset Management (DAM) software.
Since 2001 we have been developing software for managing, organizing and cataloging images, videos and other digital assets for professional and amateur photographers, photo agencies, artists, scientists, corporate, institutional and governmental users.

  • User Community
  • YouTube
  • Facebook
  • 𝕏

Copyright © 2025 photools.com